Show simple item record

DFA cites UNCLOS vs ban

dc.contributor.authorLocus, Sundy
dc.coverage.spatialSouth China Seaen
dc.coverage.spatialWest Philippine Seaen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T02:36:09Z
dc.date.available2024-08-09T02:36:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-20
dc.identifier.citationLocus, S. (2021, May 20). DFA cites UNCLOS vs ban. Daily Tribune, pp. A1, A2.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12174/14757
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherConcept & Information Group, Inc.en
dc.titleDFA cites UNCLOS vs banen
dc.typenewspaperArticleen
dc.citation.journaltitleDaily Tribuneen
dc.citation.firstpageA1en
dc.citation.lastpageA2en
local.subject.classificationDT20210520_A1en
local.descriptionThe Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) on Wednesday returned to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in asserting its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) where China had unitarily imposed a fishing ban recently. China’s fishing ban encompasses the whole of the South China Sea (SCS) but it encroaches on the West Philippine Sea (WPS) in the eastern part of the SCS. The WPS includes the Philippines’ EEZ. Protesting China’s fishing ban that could affect the Filipino fishermen already displaced by the Chinese militia fleets’ presence in many parts within and outside of the WPS, the Philippines — through the DFA — said it does not recognize the foreign order.en
local.subject.personalnameDuterte, Rodrigo
local.subject.personalnameLocsin, Teodoro Jr
local.subject.personalnameRoque, Harry
local.subject.corporatenameDepartment of Foreign Affairs (DFA)en
dc.subject.agrovocUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the Seaen
dc.subject.agrovocexclusive economic zonesen
dc.subject.agrovocfishingen
dc.subject.agrovoclaw of the seaen
dc.subject.agrovocinternational lawen
dc.subject.agrovocterritorial watersen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record