dc.contributor.author | Murcia, Alvin | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Navotas | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-16T05:58:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-16T05:58:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Murcia, A. (2022, June 9). Supreme Court junks Navotas fisher' petition. Daily Tribune, p. A8. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12174/12764 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Concept & Information Group, Inc. | en |
dc.subject | fishers | en |
dc.subject | governmental organizations | en |
dc.subject | illegal fishing | en |
dc.subject | fishing | en |
dc.subject | fishing vessels | en |
dc.subject | resolution | en |
dc.subject | monitoring systems | en |
dc.subject | fishery regulations | en |
dc.title | Supreme Court junks Navotas fisher' petition | en |
dc.type | newspaperArticle | en |
dc.citation.journaltitle | Daily Tribune | en |
dc.citation.firstpage | A8 | en |
local.seafdecaqd.controlnumber | DT20220609_A8 | en |
local.seafdecaqd.extract | The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday disclosed it has dismissed the petition by Navotas fisherman and internal non-government organization for the issuance of a writ of continuing mandamus to compel concerned government agencies to implement measures that would address illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, particularly by commercial fishing vessel. The court en banc in a resolution held that it would not interfere with the respondents' - Department of Agriculture (DA) and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) - exercise of administrative discretion. | en |
local.subject.personalName | Febria, Arnulfo | |
local.subject.personalName | Leongson, Edgardo | |
local.subject.personalName | Rondon, Bernardo Jr. | |
local.subject.corporateName | Department of Agriculture (DA) | en |
local.subject.corporateName | Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) | en |
local.subject.corporateName | Oceana Philippines | en |