| dc.contributor.author | Tiglao, Rigoberto D. | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | West Philippine Sea | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Philippines | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | China | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | South China Sea | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Spratlys | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Scarborough Shoal | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Mischief Reef | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Reed Bank | en |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Kalayaan Island Group (KIG) | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-27T07:41:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-27T07:41:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-05-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Tiglao, R. D. (2021, May 7). Arbitration 'award': A P1-billion useless piece of paper. The Manila Times, pp. A1, A5. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12174/10836 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | The Manila Times Publishing Corporation | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://www.manilatimes.net/2021/05/07/opinion/columnists/topanalysis/arbitration-award-a-p1-billion-useless-piece-of-paper/871008 | en |
| dc.subject | law of the sea | en |
| dc.subject | international law | en |
| dc.subject | disputes | en |
| dc.subject | territorial waters | en |
| dc.subject | United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea | en |
| dc.subject | Exclusive economic zone | en |
| dc.subject | fishers | en |
| dc.subject | fishing | en |
| dc.subject | Oil and gas exploration | en |
| dc.subject | Governments | en |
| dc.title | Arbitration 'award': A P1-billion useless piece of paper | en |
| dc.type | newspaperArticle | en |
| dc.citation.journaltitle | The Manila Times | en |
| dc.citation.firstpage | A1 | en |
| dc.citation.lastpage | A5 | en |
| local.seafdecaqd.controlnumber | MT20210507_A1 | en |
| local.seafdecaqd.extract | President Duterte was absolutely correct when he remarked the other night that the “award” (i.e., ruling) of the arbitration suit that the Aquino 3rd administration brought against China in 2013 was a useless “piece of paper.” It is useless, since the “award,” after extensively discussing the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) provisions and the Philippine claims for 500 pages, does not order China to do anything. It even emphasized that its “award” was “without prejudice to any questions of sovereignty or maritime boundary delimitation.” (I place the term “award” in quotation marks as it is used in the document of the arbitration panel, not in the ordinary sense of something substantial being given. The panel uses that term only since it can’t use “decision” or “ruling” as it is not a court of law. The “award” awards nothing. Read it and it turns out to be merely in the nature of an academic discussion.) | en |
| local.subject.personalName | Duterte, Rodrigo | |
| local.subject.personalName | Carpio, Antonio | |
| local.subject.personalName | del Rosario, Albert | |
| local.subject.personalName | Talmon, Stefan | |
| local.subject.personalName | Llamas, Ronald | |
| local.subject.personalName | Nguyen, Bach | |
| local.subject.personalName | Hoag, Foley | |
| local.subject.corporateName | United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) | en |
| local.subject.corporateName | People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) | en |
