Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYbiernas, Van
dc.coverage.spatialChinaen
dc.coverage.spatialSouth China Seaen
dc.coverage.spatialWest Philippine Seaen
dc.coverage.spatialPhilippinesen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T08:27:10Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T08:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-30
dc.identifier.citationYbiernas, V. (2020, October 30). The sea as the focal point. The Manila Times , p. A6.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12174/10100
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe Manila Times Publishing Corporationen
dc.relation.urihttps://www.manilatimes.net/2020/10/30/opinion/columnists/the-sea-as-the-focal-point/788654/en
dc.subjectterritorial watersen
dc.subjectdisputesen
dc.titleThe sea as the focal pointen
dc.typenewspaperArticleen
dc.citation.journaltitleThe Manila Timesen
dc.citation.firstpageA6en
local.seafdecaqd.controlnumberMT20201030_A6en
local.seafdecaqd.extractThe Chinese referred to Southeast Asia (SEA) in ancient times as Nanyang, or the “southern seas.” In some ways, this name can be traced to the same logic that gave SEA the name Suvarnadvipa, or “land of gold” for the South Asians: they are rooted in the commercial relations of SEA with both neighboring giants. Trade between SEA and China was always done through the now-contentious South China Sea (SCS) — renamed West Philippine Sea (WPS) by Filipinos for nationalistic reasons. Russell Fifield makes an interesting point when he said: “It should be stressed that… [Nanyang] reflected the roles of the sea-minded people who used them and focused on seas with their adjacent lands rather than on lands with their adjacent seas.”en
local.subject.personalNameFifield, Russell
local.subject.personalNamePtak, Roderich


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record